RegisterDonateLogin

Does not grant you the rank of Master.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Explain the obsession with the EU to me Options
juice man
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 5:00:46 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
gandalfthegreatestwizard wrote:
shmi15 wrote:
trappedslider wrote:
I think I may be burned at the stake for this but...I'm actually enjoying episodes 7 and 8. After finishing the Fate of the Jedi story line I just got tired of SW it was like "What's this weeks galactic threat?" I honestly felt like everything that happened in the books was basically pointless due to the comics timeline.

With the new canon system in place,it feels tighter and more streamlined, along with an touch of uncertainty,since you don't know how the verse is going to end up.




Complete opposite! I am on board with you about this, almost to the T. And there are a few others who see it the same way. I was just more curious why people refuse the Disney Universe, but claim the books and EU to be the greatest thing the world has ever seen! ( Extreme over exaggeration)


I still don't see how you're having a problem with this. Is it totally beyond your comprehension that people like something that you don't, or dislike something you're in love with?

How you phrased your comment (quoted in bold) seems to me like you think and are implying that it is somehow contradictory, or hypocritical, or nonsensical, that people can like the EU and dislike the DU (Disney Universe) at the same time. Personally, I don't see how it is any of those.
Exactly.
A friend of mine once said he liked Pink Floyd but only when Syd Barrett was with them. A few years out of several decades of music.

Just a matter of taste.
shmi15
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 6:03:32 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,290
juice man wrote:
gandalfthegreatestwizard wrote:
shmi15 wrote:
trappedslider wrote:
I think I may be burned at the stake for this but...I'm actually enjoying episodes 7 and 8. After finishing the Fate of the Jedi story line I just got tired of SW it was like "What's this weeks galactic threat?" I honestly felt like everything that happened in the books was basically pointless due to the comics timeline.

With the new canon system in place,it feels tighter and more streamlined, along with an touch of uncertainty,since you don't know how the verse is going to end up.




Complete opposite! I am on board with you about this, almost to the T. And there are a few others who see it the same way. I was just more curious why people refuse the Disney Universe, but claim the books and EU to be the greatest thing the world has ever seen! ( Extreme over exaggeration)


I still don't see how you're having a problem with this. Is it totally beyond your comprehension that people like something that you don't, or dislike something you're in love with?

How you phrased your comment (quoted in bold) seems to me like you think and are implying that it is somehow contradictory, or hypocritical, or nonsensical, that people can like the EU and dislike the DU (Disney Universe) at the same time. Personally, I don't see how it is any of those.
Exactly.
A friend of mine once said he liked Pink Floyd but only when Syd Barrett was with them. A few years out of several decades of music.

Just a matter of taste.




The problem I am having with any of this, is you over look all the problems with EU. The constant overlapping of ideas, and how nothing flowed together, and was really just written to be written and make money. Exactly what Disney is doing... Yet, now, all of a sudden, 30 years later, its a terrible idea and it should never happen?

I get the idea that your "attached" to an idea. I get that as a kid, this is what you imagined Luke may or may not do. But it doesn't make it canon, in fact, it never was canon. We just accepted it because we never thought we would get Episodes 1-9. Now that we are, you have to be open to the idea of its not going to happen the way you want.

I blame Millenials for crying all the time when they don't get things their way... And I am seeing now how some of them acquired this gene.
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 6:23:14 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
shmi15 wrote:
The problem I am having with any of this, is you over look all the problems with EU. The constant overlapping of ideas, and how nothing flowed together, and was really just written to be written and make money. Exactly what Disney is doing... Yet, now, all of a sudden, 30 years later, its a terrible idea and it should never happen?


That's probably the biggest reason people are so attached to the EU. They basically pick and choose what they like and it makes it easier to ignore the rest. I personally am indifferent to both versions of the universe. IMO nothing Disney has done has been so awesome that it's not worth ignoring, infact from a storyline perspective they really aren't very good at all. There seems to be little to no consistency, and that's what bothers me most about the Disney stuff.

The Thrawn Books are easily some of the best the EU has to offer since they not only did something different, but also created a very compelling villain in doing so. Disney villains are all just more of the same, but not as good. Snoke would have been much more interesting as 1. not a chump and 2. not a force user (also if he was like 3 feet tall that would've been kind of funny and cool, provided point 1 was addressed first). Instead he was just a pathetic Palpatine wannabe, and they flat out tell you Kylo is a Vader wannabe.

And don't get me started on the mess that is Phasma.... Watching TFA, I still say she would be a much more interesting character if she were to be Finn's Mother, her interactions with him in that movie take on a much deeper meaning if she were... too late for that now... now she's just a fancy Stormtrooper that can't do crap.
lifelike
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 6:52:56 AM
Rank: Vornskr
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/2/2015
Posts: 27
A problem for Disney is all the damage control they need to do after Lucas' episodes 6, 1, 2, 3. Like the completely unnecessary thing with Leia being Luke's sister that has no impact at all in the old movies other than allowing Leia and Han become a couple without 50 % of fans being upset that she did not choose Luke instead. Making a good space opera into Skywalker soap opera. And pretty much all of PT that just keeps making it increasingly worse. I think Disney has been doing a great job so far given what they had to work with, making the first really good things for (canon) Star Wars since 1980.

Lucas would 100 % have made Phasma his mother and turned the rest into soap opera as well, and we would have had a lot more scenes with people walking around in front of a green screen talking and then jump around in front of the same green screen doing acrobatics with light sabers.
shmi15
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 7:08:03 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,290
Lord_Ball wrote:
shmi15 wrote:
The problem I am having with any of this, is you over look all the problems with EU. The constant overlapping of ideas, and how nothing flowed together, and was really just written to be written and make money. Exactly what Disney is doing... Yet, now, all of a sudden, 30 years later, its a terrible idea and it should never happen?


That's probably the biggest reason people are so attached to the EU. They basically pick and choose what they like and it makes it easier to ignore the rest. I personally am indifferent to both versions of the universe. IMO nothing Disney has done has been so awesome that it's not worth ignoring, infact from a storyline perspective they really aren't very good at all. There seems to be little to no consistency, and that's what bothers me most about the Disney stuff.

The Thrawn Books are easily some of the best the EU has to offer since they not only did something different, but also created a very compelling villain in doing so. Disney villains are all just more of the same, but not as good. Snoke would have been much more interesting as 1. not a chump and 2. not a force user (also if he was like 3 feet tall that would've been kind of funny and cool, provided point 1 was addressed first). Instead he was just a pathetic Palpatine wannabe, and they flat out tell you Kylo is a Vader wannabe.

And don't get me started on the mess that is Phasma.... Watching TFA, I still say she would be a much more interesting character if she were to be Finn's Mother, her interactions with him in that movie take on a much deeper meaning if she were... too late for that now... now she's just a fancy Stormtrooper that can't do crap.





So, which books have you read?
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 7:41:32 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
lifelike wrote:
A problem for Disney is all the damage control they need to do after Lucas' episodes 6, 1, 2, 3. Like the completely unnecessary thing with Leia being Luke's sister that has no impact at all in the old movies other than allowing Leia and Han become a couple without 50 % of fans being upset that she did not choose Luke instead. Making a good space opera into Skywalker soap opera. And pretty much all of PT that just keeps making it increasingly worse. I think Disney has been doing a great job so far given what they had to work with, making the first really good things for (canon) Star Wars since 1980.

Lucas would 100 % have made Phasma his mother and turned the rest into soap opera as well, and we would have had a lot more scenes with people walking around in front of a green screen talking and then jump around in front of the same green screen doing acrobatics with light sabers.


The Prequels really aren't that bad, If you look at the actual plot and it's development throughout the movies it's actually pretty well done. Things like the distractingly heavy use of CGI and the love story of Anakin and Padme being forced are valid complaints, but other complaints about things that "you just don't like" (AKA Midichlorians) are really just superficial.

Leia does have a purpose being Luke's twin, Vader uses that knowledge to incite anger in Luke hoping to turn him to the dark side, and if not destroy him and turn her.

The problem with Disney's movies is they don't make sense, other than TFA which clearly went for the nostalgia play.

Rogue One, the one thing this movie really needed to do was setup the Empire as a great threat to the galaxy. Unfortunatley the only threats in the movie are the Death Star (well established as such in Episode 4), and Vader (Good Job on that one). Everything else about the Empire in that movie was complete garbage! It didn't feel like they were rebelling against an evil militant force and it's dictator, but rather throwing a fit because they just didn't like the way things were... and that absolutely pointless brain sucking monster was completely unnecessary and stupid beyond all hope.

TLJ... (I know my first issue is really just a superficial complaint, but the rest, well most of them anyway, stand firm)


shmi15 wrote:
So, which books have you read?

The first 3 X-wing books
Courtship of Leia
The Han Solo Trilogy (rebel dawn I think was the third in the series)
The first couple Vong Books
The Trawn Trilogy
Phasma (the only one of the new stuff as I haven't been impressed enough to care, but I liked the potential Phasma had from TFA and was intrigued, only to be horribly let down)
The one that leads into the events of TPM (Cestus Deception I think)
Various of the comic series (if you want to count them)
I have the books from the Jacen and Jaina fiasco, but haven't sat down to read them yet.

A several of the scholastic ones that were ok that I can't remember the lines/names of off the top of my head, and probably a few other. (quite a random assortment)
shmi15
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 7:53:53 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,290
Lord_Ball wrote:
lifelike wrote:



[quote=shmi15]So, which books have you read?

The first 3 X-wing books
Courtship of Leia
The Han Solo Trilogy (rebel dawn I think was the third in the series)
The first couple Vong Books
The Trawn Trilogy
Phasma (the only one of the new stuff as I haven't been impressed enough to care, but I liked the potential Phasma had from TFA and was intrigued, only to be horribly let down)
The one that leads into the events of TPM (Cestus Deception I think)
Various of the comic series (if you want to count them)
I have the books from the Jacen and Jaina fiasco, but haven't sat down to read them yet.

A several of the scholastic ones that were ok that I can't remember the lines/names of off the top of my head, and probably a few other. (quite a random assortment)





So... Your comparing the EU, which are books/comics and games, to 2 movies in the Disney Universe? And 1 book, Phasma, which really wasn't that great? This is the exact problem I have. Everyone who complains about the DU (Disney UNiverse) really haven't put the time or effort into learning anything.

There are comics out about Poe/Vader/Leia/Chewy/Lando/Caleb Dume

Also "general" comics about STAR WARS ( the original heros) Ben Kenobi, events that take place immediately after Episode 6 to help set up the Universe they are creating. There are mini 5 series comics to fill in voids in certain places

There is a new video game, Battlefront 2, which I hear has a good storyline, have yet to play it myself.

There are also a ton of new Books....

Thrawn ( written by Timothy Zahn) And Thrawn 2 is coming out this year
The Aftermath Trilogy
Lords of the Sith
Ahsoka
Catalyst
Phasma
Dark Disciples
Battlefront
Battlefront 2 Inferno Squad
Star wars, A New Dawn
Heir to the Jedi
Bloodlines


And I am sure there are a few that I have left off. So why base your opinion on the DU on 2 movies, if you know absolutely nothing about the build up or back story for those movies? Your literally setting yourself up to be disappointed.




EDIT - this is not a personal attack on you. This is a generalization of complaints I have heard, and peoples lack of knowledge in the DU.
lifelike
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:04:21 AM
Rank: Vornskr
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/2/2015
Posts: 27
Lord_Ball wrote:

The Prequels really aren't that bad, If you look at the actual plot and it's development throughout the movies it's actually pretty well done. Things like the distractingly heavy use of CGI and the love story of Anakin and Padme being forced are valid complaints, but other complaints about things that "you just don't like" (AKA Midichlorians) are really just superficial.


Quote:
Leia does have a purpose being Luke's twin, Vader uses that knowledge to incite anger in Luke hoping to turn him to the dark side, and if not destroy him and turn her.


We already knew he loved Leia and we already saw how Luke+Leia+Han and their friends cared for each other in general, all the danger they put each other through to save Han from Jabba, it would have worked just as well to make Luke mad without Leia, or Vader could just have used other threats. Throne room was definitely the height of the movie of course, but it did not need them to be siblings to be that.

The scenes in ROTJ establishing that Luke and Leia are siblings are extremely weak compared to the "I am your father" moment they obviously try to repeat, just mention it almost in passing, on level with the worst emotional scenes in the prequels. A movie with already way too many weak scenes and unnecessary sub-plots (and people complain about the casino in TLJ!) could really have done without that.

And in the prequels the fact that twins are born instead of just one kid adds again nothing other than that they had to do that because of that being an established fact from ROTJ. It was a great moment for Lucas to throw us a real surprise, revealing that they were in fact not siblings at all. I still think episode 3 was by far the best of the prequels, but almost only because of the order 66 scenes. Everything about Obi and Anakin and the emperor is pretty boring and predictable (not to mention the dated special effects, especially the lava planet... at least my kids got a good laugh watching that).

Bothers me that the good "I am your father" moment is turned into "this is just a silly soap opera and everyone is by coincidence related here" in the next movie, trying to shock the audience a second time. Not that I mind now how it ended up with Han+Leia in the new movies. Guess that kind of makes up for it, setting things up for Kylo like that.

Quote:

Rogue One, the one thing this movie really needed to do was setup the Empire as a great threat to the galaxy. Unfortunatley the only threats in the movie are the Death Star (well established as such in Episode 4), and Vader (Good Job on that one). Everything else about the Empire in that movie was complete garbage! It didn't feel like they were rebelling against an evil militant force and it's dictator, but rather throwing a fit because they just didn't like the way things were... and that absolutely pointless brain sucking monster was completely unnecessary and stupid beyond all hope.


I never even considered that as something that movie "needed to do". It was a good fun war adventure movie and good father+daughter movie. Maybe it would have been even better in the earlier form before they cut it to be more family friendly (will we ever see a director's cut?).
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:07:04 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
Don't get me wrong I'm not saying the DU is terrible, I'm just saying from my experience I haven't been impressed by it enough to warrant greater attention (I'm guessing others share this sentiment, and hold onto their precious EU in response). As I said I'm indifferent to both universes, some of the stuff I have read in it has been great (starting with the Thrawn trilogy was a great way to spark the interest in more, unfortunately the opposite was true with the Phasma book).

lifelike wrote:
I never even considered that as something that movie "needed to do". It was a good fun war adventure movie and good father+daughter movie. Maybe it would have been even better in the earlier form before they cut it to be more family friendly (will we ever see a director's cut?).

If the Empire isn't an evil threat to the galaxy why start a rebellion? Hence why (to me at least) it was imperative to establish that.
jen'ari
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:12:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
Lord_Ball wrote:

The Prequels really aren't that bad, If you look at the actual plot and it's development throughout the movies it's actually pretty well done. Things like the distractingly heavy use of CGI and the love story of Anakin and Padme being forced are valid complaints, but other complaints about things that "you just don't like" (AKA Midichlorians) are really just superficial.

Leia does have a purpose being Luke's twin, Vader uses that knowledge to incite anger in Luke hoping to turn him to the dark side, and if not destroy him and turn her.

The problem with Disney's movies is they don't make sense, other than TFA which clearly went for the nostalgia play.

Rogue One, the one thing this movie really needed to do was setup the Empire as a great threat to the galaxy. Unfortunatley the only threats in the movie are the Death Star (well established as such in Episode 4), and Vader (Good Job on that one). Everything else about the Empire in that movie was complete garbage! It didn't feel like they were rebelling against an evil militant force and it's dictator, but rather throwing a fit because they just didn't like the way things were... and that absolutely pointless brain sucking monster was completely unnecessary and stupid beyond all hope.


The prequels are bad, especially Attack of the Clones and Phantom Menace. It is the script that is terrible.
Jar Jar is unforgivable, absolute garbage. On more than one level. If they had just left him on the ship while on Tatooine it would have been alright, but all the just worthless and infuriating scenes with his tongue on things and running into the Dug and getting his tongue numbed are just awful and take away from awesome Qui-Gon.

Anakin "Are you an angel" and than when he was piloting the ship?!?!?!?!?!? "Whoa!"
it was so bad.
Padme was not any better.
Midichlorian was a bad idea from the start. Just have Qui-Gon sense in the force Anakin's power and that is way way better.
The problem is the acting what that kid, just bad bad bad.
They made very little connection between the lessons Yoda taught and the actions of Anakin.
"Afraid to lose your mother"

"what does that have to do with anything?"
"EVEYRTHING, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering"

what a friggin lesson. he gets another lesson from Yoda further on which is GREAT stuff. Than Hayden does a great job with the scene with the Sand People that killed his mother. just fantastic! but it was ruined by Padme... who was just bad bad bad.


So the connections between the movies are better imo, but ONLY because we already know what is happening and what is going to happen and what has to happen.

With Last Jedi we do not know what has happened, what is going to happen at all, we have no story to base it off of.
We have nothing. But there is nothing in the Last Jedi that cannot be explained by something, one of the main reasons for that is that there is nothing there to disprove it.

But Rogue One did not need to completely make the Empire this terribly awful organization that has already been done. That is being done in the Rebels TV show. Also Tarkin was very very menacing and powerful in the movie.
Rogue One put a microscope on the huge universe and focused it onto a few characters. which was fun and made Orson bigger than he actually was.
lifelike
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:13:13 AM
Rank: Vornskr
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/2/2015
Posts: 27
The big problem with the prequels, and what has put me off watching Clone Wars (I still intend to, sometime) is that other than the story about Anakin (that I don't care about... Vader needed no backstory anyway, he was a perfect villain already) it is all about a war between two sides fighting for the same purpose. That can be a fun gimmick as a plot for a conspiracy movie, but to draw it out over three movies and one long tv series when the audience already knows from the very beginning that Palpatine is behind all of it. That is for me the worst thing about the prequels. I do not know good acting enough to be bothered much by bad acting and I am old enough to not be too bothered by the dated special effects, but just watching everyone again and again run around and just do what the bad guy wants everyone to do, and it does not matter if the clones or droids win... When I started watching the Clone Wars this just bothered me every episode. Many say that the series gets better later and I guess if there are many fun other sub-plots going on even if the main story is pointless there might still be something worth seeing. But when the Clone Wars comes up in EU they often had better interpretations of it than what Lucas had. I would not have minded instead seeing the jedis fight together with mandalorian super-commandos against the emperor's clone armies to try to prevent the emperor from taking over the galaxy for instance (even knowing that they would fail). That would have allowed for many more interesting stories than just seeing everyone be Palpatines puppets.

EDIT: Yeah. We all had our own ideas about what the unexplained things in Star Wars would turn out to be, partially influenced by the EU, partly just our imagination I guess. And like many others I have had a difficult time accepting some now-canon truths over the years. I fully admit that. :)
lifelike
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:18:22 AM
Rank: Vornskr
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/2/2015
Posts: 27
Lord_Ball wrote:


lifelike wrote:
I never even considered that as something that movie "needed to do". It was a good fun war adventure movie and good father+daughter movie. Maybe it would have been even better in the earlier form before they cut it to be more family friendly (will we ever see a director's cut?).

If the Empire isn't an evil threat to the galaxy why start a rebellion? Hence why (to me at least) it was imperative to establish that.


But the rebellion was already on (and it was already going on in Rebels that pre-dates R1). If they ever need to establish just how evil the Empire is they can do that in some new prequel later. I never even considered that doing that would have been important for R1. The rebellion was already a fact for whatever reasons. Everyone always accepted that when watching the OT anyway even if there was little actual on-screen evidence that the empire was the evil side (mostly that they dressed in black and Vader had a scary voice).
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:21:38 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
jen'ari wrote:

The prequels are bad, especially Attack of the Clones and Phantom Menace. It is the script that is terrible.
Jar Jar is unforgivable, absolute garbage. On more than one level. If they had just left him on the ship while on Tatooine it would have been alright, but all the just worthless and infuriating scenes with his tongue on things and running into the Dug and getting his tongue numbed are just awful and take away from awesome Qui-Gon.

Yeah there are some... we'll say less than spectacular, dialogue issues, but the overall story the movies tell makes sense.

jen'ari wrote:
With Last Jedi we do not know what has happened, what is going to happen at all, we have no story to base it off of.
We have nothing. But there is nothing in the Last Jedi that cannot be explained by something, one of the main reasons for that is that there is nothing there to disprove it.

Well TLJ takes everything setup by TFA and, well, makes most of it a big mess really.

jen'ari wrote:
But Rogue One did not need to completely make the Empire this terribly awful organization that has already been done. That is being done in the Rebels TV show. Also Tarkin was very very menacing and powerful in the movie.
Rogue One put a microscope on the huge universe and focused it onto a few characters. which was fun and made Orson bigger than he actually was.

It's a fun movie sure, all SW movies are, but if you're going to do a movie about starting a Rebellion shouldn't you do a better job to establish just why you need to rebel?

Edit: A one-shot movie really should be a complete experience IMO. I've seen about half the episodes of Rebels first season, and really all it would have taken was one scene showing them take over 1 planet, instead you have them already established on the planet, which loses a lot of the effect.
jen'ari
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:42:47 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
Lord_Ball wrote:
jen'ari wrote:

The prequels are bad, especially Attack of the Clones and Phantom Menace. It is the script that is terrible.
Jar Jar is unforgivable, absolute garbage. On more than one level. If they had just left him on the ship while on Tatooine it would have been alright, but all the just worthless and infuriating scenes with his tongue on things and running into the Dug and getting his tongue numbed are just awful and take away from awesome Qui-Gon.

Yeah there are some... we'll say less than spectacular, dialogue issues, but the overall story the movies tell makes sense.

jen'ari wrote:
With Last Jedi we do not know what has happened, what is going to happen at all, we have no story to base it off of.
We have nothing. But there is nothing in the Last Jedi that cannot be explained by something, one of the main reasons for that is that there is nothing there to disprove it.

Well TLJ takes everything setup by TFA and, well, makes most of it a big mess really.

jen'ari wrote:
But Rogue One did not need to completely make the Empire this terribly awful organization that has already been done. That is being done in the Rebels TV show. Also Tarkin was very very menacing and powerful in the movie.
Rogue One put a microscope on the huge universe and focused it onto a few characters. which was fun and made Orson bigger than he actually was.

It's a fun movie sure, all SW movies are, but if you're going to do a movie about starting a Rebellion shouldn't you do a better job to establish just why you need to rebel?


I agree with you that the stroy is better paced and even spelled out. But like I said they are prequels and we already knew what was going to happen. It makes the story already better because we know how everything is going to go.

There is always this complaint that TLJ takes a dump on FA. Well that is a tiny bit true.
but, for me, who cares? FA as garbage imo and created a TON of problems.

#1 problem, what to do with Finn the weanie? What to do with Phasma the weak minded? what to do with Snoke? what to do with Luke?

If Abrams gave Luke a few minutes of introduction it would have helped tremendously.
I mean, think about it.
Force Awakens gives NO answers to anything. Not a single thing. It is all left for Johnson. Phasma, no back story, no action, nothing.
Snoke, no backstory, no action, nothing
Kylo, no backstory, little action
Rey, no backstory, Mary Sue
Luke, NOTHING at all
Poe, no backstory
Finn, tiny backstory, set him up as a coward.

Abrams did nothing that everyone wanted Johnson to do and they do not fault him for his terrible story telling.

Everyone should be thanking Johnson for getting rid of some of those issues so that the final movie has somewhere to go and can conclude without being a 6 hour long movie.

If Snoke was alive, if Luke was alive, if Kylo wasn't the leader, if Rey didn't grow into the "last jedi", if Phasma was still around, etc. than the final movie could not focus the way it needs to.
If I was Johnson I would have left Phasma in a trash compactor and Finn in a coma and not dealt with them at all.


It was not a movie about starting a rebellion. The rebellion was in full force, the Death Star was making them think it was not worth continuing the rebellion. It was a rebellion within the rebellion. the "Rogues" were reblling against Dodonna and others of the already established rebellion.
The Empire was already seen as a devastating threat in the movie and in the Rebels tv show.
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 8:53:06 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
jen'ari wrote:
There is always this complaint that TLJ takes a dump on FA. Well that is a tiny bit true.
but, for me, who cares? FA as garbage imo and created a TON of problems.

#1 problem, what to do with Finn the weanie? What to do with Phasma the weak minded? what to do with Snoke? what to do with Luke?


This is a HUGE problem as it creates an inconsistency which in a trilogy does little more than make everything a big mess.

Leaving things open like that actually went in Johnsons favor, unfortunately most of what he decided to do was go straight down the middle without committing to giving any of the characters (aside from a couple) any kind of meaningful development.

jen'ari wrote:
It was not a movie about starting a rebellion. The rebellion was in full force, the Death Star was making them think it was not worth continuing the rebellion. It was a rebellion within the rebellion. the "Rogues" were reblling against Dodonna and others of the already established rebellion.
The Empire was already seen as a devastating threat in the movie and in the Rebels tv show.


Point taken, (starting a rebellion/continuing a rebellion is merely semantics really) but still I stand by my point that showing the empire truly take over a single planet (maybe 15 minutes of screen time) would have gone a long way to making the movie feel complete... Heck for time sake cut out the brain sucking creature as it added absolutely nothing since the defector was already trying to give them the info they were seeking. You can still have Bhodi locked up!

Instead we see the Empire as complete pushovers except for Vader and the Death Star, which actually takes away from the feeling of desperation by the rebels the whole movie tries to convey. Oh and drop the ridiculous notion the exhaust port was a manufactured weakness... Just have them need to get the plans to discover a real weakness as was implied in Episode 4. Small tweaks like that would have made R1 an incredible movie.
jen'ari
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 11:35:11 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
Lord_Ball wrote:

This is a HUGE problem as it creates an inconsistency which in a trilogy does little more than make everything a big mess.

Leaving things open like that actually went in Johnsons favor, unfortunately most of what he decided to do was go straight down the middle without committing to giving any of the characters (aside from a couple) any kind of meaningful development.


what inconsistencies?

right, there were way too many characters to develop BECAUSE abrams did nothing to develop a single character other than Han Solo's death helping define him. Literally that is all we got. No answer on who Rey was, Poe was, how Kylo fell, who Snoke was, etc.
The other thing is that if you look at the originals it only focused on a few people.
Luke, Leia, and Han.

Vader was barely in any of the films. He had no backstory, no explanation, no anything. People Loved it and love it now. Sometimes not knowing is great.
Tarkin died in A New Hope, people didn't whine and complain and they still don't.
There is no back story, no explanation for why he didn't evacuate the Death Star or anything. There is no explanation for the Emperor, how he came to power, etc. everyone loved him and still love him in those movies. He is just there.


FACT is that Abrams brought in too many characters. If Poe is the character that is going somewhere then there is little time for Finn, Kylo, Luke, Rey, Snoke, Phasma, Hux are all big screen time characters because of Abrams.

I am so happy that a lot of them were killed off so we can have that "Magnifying glass" focus of the originals for the final chapter of the trilogy.

From FA

Kylo is Vader
Rey is Luke
Hux is Tarkin
Chewie is Chewie
BB-8 is R2
Jabba the Hutt is Unkarr
Han Solo is Obi-Wan Kenobi
Leia is Leia

Finn is??? Han Solo I guess.. but he sucks and there is already Han
Snoke is??? Emperor I assume even though we don't see the emperor in A New Hope
Maz Kanata is???
Phasma is???


See what I mean? just too many people going on. and on top of that each of those gets more pushed in screen time.R2 had practical roles, Jabba the Hutt was there for 1 minute, Obi-Wan died early which freed up time, Kylo is much much more prevalent than Vader, than there are 3 more characters to worry about that are brought in: Snoke, Maz Kanata, and Phasma.

The amount of people is way too much, Abrams made it Avenger level amount of people to take care of. Johnson had to bring it back to good story telling levels.
Lord_Ball wrote:


Point taken, (starting a rebellion/continuing a rebellion is merely semantics really) but still I stand by my point that showing the empire truly take over a single planet (maybe 15 minutes of screen time) would have gone a long way to making the movie feel complete... Heck for time sake cut out the brain sucking creature as it added absolutely nothing since the defector was already trying to give them the info they were seeking. You can still have Bhodi locked up!

Instead we see the Empire as complete pushovers except for Vader and the Death Star, which actually takes away from the feeling of desperation by the rebels the whole movie tries to convey. Oh and drop the ridiculous notion the exhaust port was a manufactured weakness... Just have them need to get the plans to discover a real weakness as was implied in Episode 4. Small tweaks like that would have made R1 an incredible movie.


They did destroy a whole huge town with the newly developed Death Star and that newly developed Death Star MADE THE REBELLION DECIDE TO GIVE UP
I dont know how much more menacing/intimidating you can be than to make a group give up completely. A group that had been working for years to build a rebellion. I mean everything that the Rebels TV show is happened to stop the Empire and they were going to give all that up?!

A little perspective shows that the movie put the Empire in a very light that had yet to be seen before.
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 1:46:00 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
And Johnson added MORE characters in (of which he tried to develop -Rose is a prime example), so your point about to many characters to deal with is invalid.

Yes the Death Star is scary, Darth Vader is scary, the rest of the Imperial forces seemed to pose less of a threat than a bug on a windshield.
juice man
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 2:47:52 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
shmi15 wrote:

The problem I am having with any of this, is you over look all the problems with EU. The constant overlapping of ideas, and how nothing flowed together, and was really just written to be written and make money. Exactly what Disney is doing... Yet, now, all of a sudden, 30 years later, its a terrible idea and it should never happen?

I get the idea that your "attached" to an idea. I get that as a kid, this is what you imagined Luke may or may not do. But it doesn't make it canon, in fact, it never was canon. We just accepted it because we never thought we would get Episodes 1-9. Now that we are, you have to be open to the idea of its not going to happen the way you want.

I blame Millenials for crying all the time when they don't get things their way... And I am seeing now how some of them acquired this gene.


Here's a hypothetical conversation between person 1 and person 2.

1 "Tell me why you like this"

2 "I like it because of this, that and the other thing"

1 "You can't like it because of that. I don't understand that. Gotta be something else"

2 "Nope, like it because of that. It's how this thing called liking works. Different people like different things and they can like them for different reasons with varying degrees of intensity."

1 "Hmmm. That's wrong. The explanation is that you (and your parents) are whiners."


Boy is that some sound reasoning.

I blame stupid people. (and their parents)
jen'ari
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 2:49:26 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
Invalid?
Do you expect him to not introduce anyone?
He killed phasma, smoke, and Luke

Brought in Rose, dj, and hold.
Holdo died, phasma died, Snoke died, Luke died.


Rose is unconscious and dj is gone.

He did a great job limiting it to the key players only.

shmi15
Posted: Thursday, January 4, 2018 3:19:19 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,290
juice man wrote:
shmi15 wrote:

The problem I am having with any of this, is you over look all the problems with EU. The constant overlapping of ideas, and how nothing flowed together, and was really just written to be written and make money. Exactly what Disney is doing... Yet, now, all of a sudden, 30 years later, its a terrible idea and it should never happen?

I get the idea that your "attached" to an idea. I get that as a kid, this is what you imagined Luke may or may not do. But it doesn't make it canon, in fact, it never was canon. We just accepted it because we never thought we would get Episodes 1-9. Now that we are, you have to be open to the idea of its not going to happen the way you want.

I blame Millenials for crying all the time when they don't get things their way... And I am seeing now how some of them acquired this gene.


Here's a hypothetical conversation between person 1 and person 2.

1 "Tell me why you like this"

2 "I like it because of this, that and the other thing"

1 "You can't like it because of that. I don't understand that. Gotta be something else"

2 "Nope, like it because of that. It's how this thing called liking works. Different people like different things and they can like them for different reasons with varying degrees of intensity."

1 "Hmmm. That's wrong. The explanation is that you (and your parents) are whiners."


Boy is that some sound reasoning.

I blame stupid people. (and their parents)



Person 1-I hate the DU b/c its not consistent and the plot is bad

Person 2 - What great plot did you love in the OT?

Person 1 Its all the books in the EU! So much depth and its all so awesome!

Person 2 - Have you read anything from the DU to help you understand the new universe?

Person 1 - No! I hate it! I will never give it a chance.

Person 2 - You are crying Millenial baby.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.