|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/6/2009
Posts: 191
|
with Grand Moff Tarkin's CE, does that mean you can activate 1, 2 or 3 characters or just 2 or 3?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 1,060
Location: Lamar,Missouri
|
Yes, you can activate 1,2 or 3 in a phase just make sure that no one with accurate shot can see him, because he dies very easy
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 908
Location: Felucia, near the Ancient Abyss
|
He has 14 defense, use a Corporate All. Tank Droid and don't move. Bye Tarkin!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/11/2008
Posts: 1,122
|
Awesome has a correct ruling.
I have been a fan of this piece for a long time, and I have found that the best way to defend him is to put an ImpDig right in front of him. He still has line of sight to the enemy, but they can't shoot him now.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 908
Location: Felucia, near the Ancient Abyss
|
Unless the person has Acurate(If it's Boba, you are dead).
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
mercenary_moose wrote:Awesome has a correct ruling.
I have been a fan of this piece for a long time, and I have found that the best way to defend him is to put an ImpDig right in front of him. He still has line of sight to the enemy, but they can't shoot him now. Incorrect. Tarkin would have cover, but the Dignitary would not be the closest figure (see Diplomat). If it was just Tarkin and the Dignitary, he would still be a legal target.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 1,060
Location: Lamar,Missouri
|
Sithborg wrote:mercenary_moose wrote:Awesome has a correct ruling.
I have been a fan of this piece for a long time, and I have found that the best way to defend him is to put an ImpDig right in front of him. He still has line of sight to the enemy, but they can't shoot him now. Incorrect. Tarkin would have cover, but the Dignitary would not be the closest figure (see Diplomat). If it was just Tarkin and the Dignitary, he would still be a legal target. Yes , which is why I said "make sure they dont have accurate shot"
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 538
Location: GC, Missouri
|
awesome wrote:Sithborg wrote:mercenary_moose wrote:Awesome has a correct ruling.
I have been a fan of this piece for a long time, and I have found that the best way to defend him is to put an ImpDig right in front of him. He still has line of sight to the enemy, but they can't shoot him now. Incorrect. Tarkin would have cover, but the Dignitary would not be the closest figure (see Diplomat). If it was just Tarkin and the Dignitary, he would still be a legal target. Yes , which is why I said "make sure they dont have accurate shot" No what Sithborg is saying that Tarkin would be the legal target because the Imp Dig is not a legal target. There would be no need for an accurate shooter unless you had several figs closer so they would be the legal targets. But if the setup is like this: Shooter.............................................. Imp DIg..... Tarkin And nothing else is visible then Tarkin would be the only legal target and thus no need for accurate.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
Which is only true if there is a figure closer than Tarkin. My reading of moose's statement missed that key detail. A Diplomat is only walking cover, not a fig that is a shield to protect your fragile figs.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,219
Location: East Coast
|
Rodian BSV could help against Accurates...but that's 24pts.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 1,060
Location: Lamar,Missouri
|
dnemiller wrote:awesome wrote:Sithborg wrote:mercenary_moose wrote:Awesome has a correct ruling.
I have been a fan of this piece for a long time, and I have found that the best way to defend him is to put an ImpDig right in front of him. He still has line of sight to the enemy, but they can't shoot him now. Incorrect. Tarkin would have cover, but the Dignitary would not be the closest figure (see Diplomat). If it was just Tarkin and the Dignitary, he would still be a legal target. Yes , which is why I said "make sure they dont have accurate shot" No what Sithborg is saying that Tarkin would be the legal target because the Imp Dig is not a legal target. There would be no need for an accurate shooter unless you had several figs closer so they would be the legal targets. But if the setup is like this: Shooter.............................................. Imp DIg..... Tarkin And nothing else is visible then Tarkin would be the only legal target and thus no need for accurate. I know this but in the beginning no one brought up the dignitary so I was saying make sure they dont have accurate shot, thinking there would be more than just tarkin,and a dignitary, besides why would tarkin want to be seen if there are only 2 to activate anyways?
|
|
|
Guest |