|
Register
•
Donate
•
Login
Pass on what you have learned. |
Character Comments
©Copyright 2008-2016 Bloo Milk |
Site Map
|
Why Bloo Milk?
|
|
Register
•
Donate
•
Login
Pass on what you have learned. |
9/14/2025 9:45:11 PM
Oh look... a definitive list of NoffyD's alts. How convenient...
9/14/2025 4:35:44 AM
as the only gandalf on this website i agree with noffy
9/14/2025 4:34:42 AM
as divine lord of this website, i also agree with noffy
9/14/2025 4:33:50 AM
as owner of the website, i agree with noffy
9/14/2025 4:18:29 AM
should remove darth and add "I used to date a Darth" (Counts as a Darth)
9/12/2025 11:24:09 PM (Updated: 9/13/2025 1:32:42 AM)
I am pretty much always in the camp of "just raise the cost". That way, no one has to remember any changes in how he works. And, usually, I'm in the camp of "do nothing." Power creep in general, and direct counters as well, usually take of things on their own. However, 5 out of 6 squads that made the brackets were using Tulak... that's enough to warrant something.
9/12/2025 2:41:53 PM
I'm in the increase cost camp. Also have heard a suggestion to limit the CE to non-unique allies, which makes sense and would help some. I also think there could be a balance committee ruling preventing one piece from hopping all the way from the starting area to gambit just by using his friends' Identical Forces multiple times. There are options.
9/12/2025 4:26:32 AM
Could remove Darth. No Nexus summon, no Rule of Two, probably knocks off a couple other things from Sith.
9/12/2025 3:34:56 AM
62 points. I bet people would still play him.
9/11/2025 6:19:03 PM
Make him not be able to use force powers / points from allies and he is fine.
9/10/2025 5:36:15 PM
VassalCon 2025 agrees. 6 Sith squads in the field of 13. All 6 used Tulak, and after Swiss they finished 2nd through 7th, taking 5 of the 6 slots in the brackets. Both squads in the finals use Tulak.
9/6/2025 7:21:38 PM
Phew. Thank goodness that was fixed in a timely manner!
9/5/2025 11:32:59 PM
Errata 12 August 2011: This character has Force Immunity
9/5/2025 6:47:37 PM
yes
9/3/2025 7:13:03 PM
If I have someone using a force power to help with initiative that still works with reasonable negotiations right?
8/22/2025 7:11:46 PM
Negative, she's letting him in via CE like The Palpatine from ROTS. Vader's Apprentice doesn't have Affinity himself so his faction does not change. Now if Juno is placed in a Rebel Squad, she becomes Rebel.
8/22/2025 5:52:41 PM
Does bringing in Imperial Vader's Apprentice make him Rebel?
8/22/2025 1:40:46 PM
Such a fun design. saw some squads with it in it and had to start thinking about this piece again. Really do enjoy the piece.
8/18/2025 9:31:46 PM
Yes to both.
8/18/2025 7:14:05 PM (Updated: 8/18/2025 7:14:48 PM)
Question 1: If an ally has Damage Reduction 10 and Palps is hit for 20 damage and the absolutely devoted ally with the DR takes the damage do they take 20 or 10? Question 2: Can you absolute devotion the damage caused by unstable clone?
8/18/2025 6:54:29 AM
is there more than one clone in this piece because why is it clones not clone
8/17/2025 11:28:55 PM
yas queen
8/16/2025 9:02:52 PM
yes.
8/16/2025 1:24:23 PM
Can you use gargoyle form and then use s force to move 2 more squares? Gargoyle 8 squares?
8/16/2025 12:20:37 AM
1: Yes. 2: No (last line of the Force Nexus ability).
8/15/2025 11:08:10 PM (Updated: 8/15/2025 11:09:44 PM)
Question: #1 can this character use force to reroll defender? Question #2 can I have more than 1 of these in my squad? I don't see unique but want to make sure.
8/15/2025 10:19:49 PM
yay that is exactly what i needed for this card to be good. will be playing this piece much more often!
8/15/2025 4:28:18 PM
Seems like his shtick is his Ghost Crew tag. I do like the old one better, especially with but not limited to using Aurra with him.
8/15/2025 3:34:34 AM
fixed the hitpoints after Jason pointed out it was 10 short of the card
8/12/2025 11:27:21 PM (Updated: 8/12/2025 11:27:59 PM)
the brackets in palpatine's CE are implied in all other CEs that allow characters to spend your force points. think of it as a clarification of an invisible rule. it has to explicitly state that you can use them on the same turn and combine them if the designers want you to be able to.
8/12/2025 10:11:23 PM
^ Correct, but it’s usually explicitly stated so. See any Palpatine that has a similar CE. With this guy it doesn’t say so. But I can’t remember for the life of me if that’s intentional (as in you can), or if by DOTF it was just assumed everyone knew you can’t do that with these type of commander effects.
8/12/2025 8:28:12 PM
correct me if im wrong but i don't think you can combine other characters' force points with your own
8/12/2025 5:47:56 PM
If a character has 1 force point and wants to use it and 1 force point from this character to use a force power that costs 2 can that happen?
8/11/2025 12:32:22 AM
And you can do it twice.
8/10/2025 3:56:38 PM
Yep. Juyo will trigger on a nat 20, and use the force treats your roll as a nat 20
8/10/2025 1:00:43 AM
The damage from using the FP "Use the Force", would score 50pts damage, thanks to Juyo Style?
8/9/2025 2:57:30 AM
Key words are "for the rest of the skirmish". Revan gives QS "for the rest of the skirmish" and T'LJG doesn't have the magick words.
8/8/2025 3:02:01 PM
You still need to follow squad building rules.
8/8/2025 3:01:37 PM
Yes it can be Disrupted or Distracted or ABMed
8/8/2025 2:38:14 PM (Updated: 8/8/2025 2:38:29 PM)
Does the Luke you replace him with have to be New Republic or can I choose a Rebel Luke?
8/8/2025 2:33:56 PM
Oh yeah, I can see that gandalf. Give everyone GMA and deflect and then free Block/Deflect. Regardless you've got to keep his CE. I love the CE, it's like that Jedi Exile from a few sets back and I've had a lot of fun with that piece.
8/8/2025 2:26:07 PM
Can this CE be suppressed? Or is it like Revan's that cannot be suppressed for giving allies something?
8/7/2025 4:05:16 PM
Oooh, clever. Thanks Gandalf! And solid design. This guy's a tank
8/7/2025 2:36:58 AM
Pirate Code is two parts- a) subject to Pirate CEs (with the implication- even though a Droid) and b) not subject to non-Pirate CEs. if it was just the latter then each CE would still need to specify "Droids are subject". yes, damage from Loyal to the Crew ignores Advanced Diffusion Armor. and yes, you can give him Draw Fire with Droid Mark.
8/7/2025 12:44:25 AM
I want to know if you can give him Draw Fire with Wat Tambor etc... that would definitely use Diffusion Armor probably.
8/7/2025 12:16:04 AM
Also, does Loyalty to the Crew prevent the use of Advanced Diffusion Armor?
8/7/2025 12:13:49 AM
The wording on pirate code seems unusual. Was there a design reason not to state "This character is only subject to commander effects from Pirate commanders"?
8/6/2025 9:00:48 PM
Interesting, wonder if he works in OR, where Close-Quarters Fighting is potentially useful.
8/6/2025 12:37:19 AM
Something I really appreciate about this Dooku is that he doesn't have a commander effect. That means he can be in a squad with Qui-Gon Follower of the Living Force. I really like that a lot. Thank you designers, that's a nice touch :)
8/4/2025 10:13:24 PM
Why Disciplined Leader over OF or Juyo? (oh wait, can't take Force abilities :P, ah well)