|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/20/2015
Posts: 1,227
|
Part of Sid's CE. You decide who goes first each round regardless of initiative check, unless you roll a 1. Doesn't this mean he counters the MTB? An opponent's initiative check result automatically becomes 1.
As it reads, unless I physically Roll a One, Sid should still determine who goes first, thus countering the MTB, correct? Why or Why not?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,290
|
Caedus wrote:Part of Sid's CE. You decide who goes first each round regardless of initiative check, unless you roll a 1. Doesn't this mean he counters the MTB? An opponent's initiative check result automatically becomes 1.
As it reads, unless I physically Roll a One, Sid should still determine who goes first, thus countering the MTB, correct? Why or Why not? No. Your roll becomes a NATURAL One. To the best of my knowledge
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
shmi15 wrote:Caedus wrote:Part of Sid's CE. You decide who goes first each round regardless of initiative check, unless you roll a 1. Doesn't this mean he counters the MTB? An opponent's initiative check result automatically becomes 1.
As it reads, unless I physically Roll a One, Sid should still determine who goes first, thus countering the MTB, correct? Why or Why not? No. Your roll becomes a NATURAL One. To the best of my knowledge According to the FAQ, Tactics Broker changes your roll into a 1. Quote:Q: How does Tactics Broker interact with Recon or Anticipation?
A: Multiple rolls and rerolls still result in the selected final roll being considered a 1. Only in the case of a tie (that is, the player with Tactics Broker also rolling a 1) would the Tactics Broker ability be lost.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,407
|
Init rules get confusing. Everything works just fine on its own but gets confusing when you start to mix things together. So confusing in fact that I put this together: http://swmgamers.com/SWM/Rules/PreGame.htmlAs far as I know it's consistent with all rulings. Let me know if you find a ruling that contradicts it and I'll update it.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 2,038
|
Sid uses the same wording as master tactician
Master Tactician (You automatically choose who goes first except on a roll of 1)
so it isn't any different than the MTB/Master Tac interaction which was well defined by WOTC.
|
|
|
Guest |