RegisterDonateLogin

For those days when your overconfidence is your weakness.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Poll Question : Should we discuss San Hill, Chairman's 2nd CE?
Choice Votes Statistics
Yes, the BC should discuss San Hill, Chairman 4 50.000000 %
No, the BC need not discuss San Hill, Chairman 4 50.000000 %

Does San Hill, Chairman 2nd CE need Errata??? Options
DarkDracul
Posted: Sunday, October 26, 2025 10:21:53 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/18/2008
Posts: 1,170
Location: Kokomo
It has been suggested the balance committee consider errata to San Hill, Chairman's 2nd CE.
It's an end of turn CE that moves an ally within 6 (including Medium based characters) up to 12 squares while ignoring attacks of opportunity.

Please vote Yes if you feel the BC should consider errata.
Please vote No if you think San Hill, Chairman's CE if fine as is.

DarthMaim
Posted: Sunday, October 26, 2025 2:09:42 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/27/2008
Posts: 1,428
Location: Los Angeles, California
Stormtrooper: Let me see your identification.

Ben Kenobi: You don’t need to see his identification.

Stormtrooper: We don’t need to see his identification.

Ben Kenobi: These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.

Stormtrooper: These aren’t the droids we’re looking for.

Ben Kenobi: He can go about his business.

Stormtrooper: You can go about your business.

Ben Kenobi: Move along.

Stormtrooper: Move along. Move along.


ThumpUp
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.