RegisterDonateLogin

Ain't like dustin' crops, boy!

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Poll Question : Would you use this feature?
Choice Votes Statistics
Yes, regularly 3 25.000000 %
Yes, sometimes 0 0.000000 %
Maybe, but probably not 5 41.666666 %
Never 4 33.333333 %

Suggestion: Trade Evaluator Options
Weaver
Posted: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:03:40 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/8/2009
Posts: 149
Simple enough: a page, like Squad Builder, where you put in the figures on each side of a trade and the page gives you the money totals for each side, number of rares, uncommons, etc.
imyurhukaberry
Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:31:30 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,219
Location: East Coast
I would not use it myself. I know what I want to get and know what to give for it.

Now I'm not shooting the idea down. I suppose it could be useful for a newer person to the game. However, it seems that it would make trading too rigid for me...IF people started using it as a baseline for trading. We all know that trading is not set in stone.

"Be fluid, like water." - Bruce Lee
swinefeld
Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:41:57 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
I voted "maybe, but probably not. The only time I might use it would be for a massive UC/C trade. I think it might be a lot of work for Shinja, and what he has in place now is already the best system available (IMO).

To be fair, I don't expect to be trading very often from here on as I'm mostly finished collecting, unless Wizards goes back to 60-piece sets (and I hope they do, but that is another topic entirely).

Also, I agree with imyurhuckaberry that "price" is not the only determining factor for making good trades. I've been on either end of an "unbalanced" trade plenty of times, and have zero regrets about any of them.
swmimperial130
Posted: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 1:03:53 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 908
Location: Felucia, near the Ancient Abyss
I would definitely use this feature, and there should also be a feature in how much gameplay the piece(s) gets.
imyurhukaberry
Posted: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:03:13 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,219
Location: East Coast
You can check their gameplay in the "Character Usage" under "Characters" ;)

(not 100% accurate as it shows how many squads use a particular character and there are a TON of squads that are repeats and just not competitive; but it should give you a good idea)
Sithborg
Posted: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:26:48 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
imyurhukaberry wrote:
You can check their gameplay in the "Character Usage" under "Characters" ;)

(not 100% accurate as it shows how many squads use a particular character and there are a TON of squads that are repeats and just not competitive; but it should give you a good idea)


Actually not sure about that. When I looked at my character usage, it showed the total of each fig I used, not how many squads used them. (Uggies far outranked my number of squads).
imyurhukaberry
Posted: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:43:03 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,219
Location: East Coast
Huh. I must have misunderstood how it was calculating the results. I thought it was only one per squad usage (no matter how many were in the squad).

Well...either way it's a good shot at what characters are used the most.

ps...totally forgot I could limit it for users. Thanks for pointing that out. BlooMilk
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.