|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,219
Location: East Coast
|
Add this line to the Savage SA:
Characters with this ability ignore the Diplomat special ability.
Add this line to the Diplomat SA:
Characters with the Savage special ability ignore this ability.
(now Rancors and Acklays won't have to stop and sit while listening to a 5pt Caamasi Noble's soothing voice...it sure ain't because of his looks.)
Really you only need the Diplomat SA update, but having both would further clarify the interaction.
Please feel free to comment on why you voted the way you did. I would love to see this become a real errata to the rules.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/14/2009
Posts: 1,450
Location: At the controls
|
Conceptually, it makes sense. I tentatively give a 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/29/2008
Posts: 101
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.
|
I like it. Makes Savage characters a little more playable, and is a nice answer to those ANNOYING (and rules-wise abusive) Diplomats.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/1/2008
Posts: 818
Location: Wisconsin
|
Makes sense to me.
Savage characters are supposed to run up to an enemy and attack, not say "oops, sorry, I didn't realize you had diplomatic immunity; let me just stand here."
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 1,378
Location: Indianapolis
|
I love this rule!(I cant believe somebody didn't like it)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/3/2008
Posts: 584
Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
Sounds good to me!! Would be awesome to use some Rakghouls to wipe out your opponent's Diplomats. :P
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/5/2008
Posts: 294
|
I like it, but don't expect to see it
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/3/2008
Posts: 498
Location: somewhere over the rainbow (a rainbow in Indiana)
|
thats a yes for me.
|
|
Rank: Ewok
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/20/2008
Posts: 2
|
Sounds good - but maybe nobody voted against it, I just accidentally fatfingered the No instead of the Yes. Don't know how to take it back. So vote should be 20 - 2 not 19 - 3.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/3/2008
Posts: 328
Location: Akron, Ohio
|
I like it
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
We need this rule  I have additional suggestions  , but this poll thread is not the place 
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
LoboStele wrote:Sounds good to me!! Would be awesome to use some Rakghouls to wipe out your opponent's Diplomats. :P Oooohhh, that would be cool, and kinda bad too. I can see it now - one guy has Lobot, the other guy fields a Diplomat or three. Lobot guy brings in a Rak. Even Leia Senator would be lucky to survive an Ambush attack. Suddenly, Raks are everywhere. Run for your life! I voted yes, oops  Ah well, at least we'd see more Savage characters in play 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/10/2008
Posts: 87
Location: Ohio
|
This rule needs to be in the game, even more than our Jedi Door Trick ;)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/6/2009
Posts: 1,632
Location: Desintegrating some Djem So Sucka!
|
makes perfect sense. i love it
|
|
Rank: AT-ST
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/8/2009
Posts: 56
Location: I am here: *
|
When I saw the topic title, I thought I'd be against this initially. Then I read the suggestion itself, and now I'm completely for it! It makes so much sense! If savage characters aren't going to listen to commander effects and do everything they can to get at the enemy, why would they care about diplomatic immunity?
A resounding yes!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/13/2009
Posts: 401
|
yeah, I'd figure a great white shark doesn't care if it's against the Geneva Conventions to eat a diplomat. This does make sense!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/13/2009
Posts: 401
|
swinefeld wrote:LoboStele wrote:Sounds good to me!! Would be awesome to use some Rakghouls to wipe out your opponent's Diplomats. :P Oooohhh, that would be cool, and kinda bad too. I can see it now - one guy has Lobot, the other guy fields a Diplomat or three. Lobot guy brings in a Rak. Even Leia Senator would be lucky to survive an Ambush attack. Suddenly, Raks are everywhere. Run for your life! I voted yes, oops Ah well, at least we'd see more Savage characters in play Rakghouls have only been successful for me ONCE. Maybe I'm playing them wrong. :(
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/6/2009
Posts: 1,632
Location: Desintegrating some Djem So Sucka!
|
i play my Rakghouls with Kun. alot of damage output with an ambush makes for a very effective whooping. mind you, if you just throw those lil buggers out there, they will die. u might want toss in a good shooter to aid in the Rakghoulie-ness!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/28/2008
Posts: 355
Location: Newark, OH, USA
|
dalsiandon wrote:I like it, but don't expect to see it I agree with this sentiment. Since Savage have to end adjacent to Diplomats already, might as well have a little balance there. Great idea for a house rule to encourage more Savage play.
|
|
Rank: Kel Dor Bounty Hunter
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/12/2008
Posts: 13
|
makes sense to me
|
|
|
Guest |